My project is about flipping the classroom. In lecture-oriented classes, communication between students and teachers are severely limited. Therefore, my proposal is to eliminate the lack of social interactions within classroom without losing any lecture time. Flipping the classroom means that lectures, which always happen during class time, will be switched to homework while traditional practice problems or discussion will be done during class time. This essentially improves the social interactions between teachers and students without losing the time for information input and output.
The first teacher I discussed this proposal is Mr. Wolf, a physics teacher who employs a flipped classroom system for his AP classes. His lectures were prerecorded on Youtube in which students can access it easily at home; and during class time, AP physics students work on multiple labs, discuss problems, and practice concepts. Mr. Wolf claims that without the freed-up class time from the flipped classroom experience, his students would never be able to do as many labs, problems and also interact with the teacher as much. He, however, also warns of the limits of this flipped classroom experience. Mr. Wolf claims that this class is only for higher leveled class in which students have access to computers and are motivated to do work. In a standard class, many students are not as motivated to do work and therefore the freedom to watch the lecture sometimes can be exploited. He also claims that the prerecorded lectures have to be clear, concise, and thought-provoking; by taking away class time for lectures also takes away time for immediate questions for the lectures. Therefore, if a lecture completely confuses students and they physically cannot ask questions, then the lecture at-home part would be useless.
The second staff member I discussed with was the head of the Math Department, Mr. Paris. Mr. Paris seemed indifferent and somewhat disdainful to the idea. He claims that there are a few teachers in the math department that are using this method and that most of them find that there are no difference between their methods and that of the traditional classroom. Mr. Paris claimed that it has its "potential" and its "limits". The potential being freed up class time for interaction and the ability to rewind, pause, and fast forward lectures. The limits, according to him, were numerous such as the lack of interactive lesson learning when watching an video and lack of motivating students. Mr. Paris did not elaborate greatly on the subject and basically answered only the bare minimum of my questions. I strongly feel that the math curriculum in the high school especially are somewhat limited in their interactions based on my past experiences. Every day we are put through a hellish, monotonous lecture that half the student actually listen to.
Friday, December 21, 2012
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Friday, November 9, 2012
Office Speech revised
Pathos: I want the audience to feel concerned at the beginning about the matter presented in this issue but confident later that I will be able to achieve my goals if elected.
NOTE: Uploading the Video took almost one hour to Youtube. Sorry for the late timing.
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Office speech
Ethos: Accomplished, experienced, and hard-working security coordinator.
Pathos: I want the audience to feel dismayed in the beginning, but calm and hopeful after the speech.
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Ethos Pathos Speech
Ethos: I am a older, successful man who has experienced similar feelings as the audience. The audience is a teenager boy who is contemplating suicide.
Pathos: I am trying to evoke sympathy, fear, relativity.
Pathos: I am trying to evoke sympathy, fear, relativity.
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Research Articles ideas
What really interested me after researching about the Gulag was the psychological effects of the prison system on any particular inmates. In the article about the escaped American prisoner, he states that the imprisonment itself made him appreciate life and freedom more, supporting the common adage that "one does not fully realize how valuable something is unless one loses it". He also states that although the conditions were extremely tough, it actually "helped" him to get order in his life and fully realizes his true intent or goal. In another article, a Russian Gulag guard states that the prison did not bring any good to the prisoners themselves, only to the Soviet Industrial economy. He states that the prison turn people into "wild beast" and lost all their sympathy and feelings for others. Both viewpoints are arguable and valid; I, personally, want to investigate deeper into the issue and make a judgement myself.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)